MTU Cork Library Catalogue

Syndetics cover image
Image from Syndetics

What good are the arts? / John Carey.

By: Carey, John, 1934-.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: London : Faber and Faber, 2005Description: xii, 286 p. ; 20 cm. + hbk.ISBN: 0571226027; 0571226035.Subject(s): Aesthetics | Art -- PhilosophyDDC classification: 700.1
Contents:
What is a work of art? -- Is high art superior? -- Can science help? -- Do the arts make us better? -- Can art be a religion? -- Case for literature -- Literature and critical intelligence -- Creative reading: literature and indistinctness.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
General Lending MTU Crawford College of Art and Design Library Lending 700.1 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 00194004
General Lending MTU Crawford College of Art and Design Library Lending 700.1 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 00063308
Total holds: 0

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

From one of Britain's most eminent reviewers and academics, a delightfully sceptical and devastatingly intelligent assessment of the true value of art

Includes bibliographical references (p. 261-269) and index.

What is a work of art? -- Is high art superior? -- Can science help? -- Do the arts make us better? -- Can art be a religion? -- Case for literature -- Literature and critical intelligence -- Creative reading: literature and indistinctness.

Reviews provided by Syndetics

Publishers Weekly Review

?People in the West have been saying extravagant things about the arts for two and a half centuries,? sighs Carey, Professor of English at Oxford and eminent critic, at the outset of this witty and irreverent dismissal of cultural elitism, his second (The Intellectuals and the Masses). A work of art is whatever the experts agree on? Not so, says Carey, declaring instead that a work of art is ?anything that anyone has ever considered a work of art.? Well surely some art is ?superior? to others? But again Carey demurs, finding so-called high art to be ?culturally constructed? at best, and ?spectacularly wrong,? ?self-deluding? and ?catastrophic? at worst. To illustrate, Carey finds parallels between terrorists and those who defend high art on grounds of its purity and depth (both pit themselves against Western popular culture). In another passage, Carey cripples the argument that art appreciation creates emphatic and thoughtful people by remembering Hitler?s ?intense? love of opera and architecture. In Part Two, Carey argues the ?supremacy? of literature in the same extravagant terms he just debunked (reading ?has the power to change people?). Regrettably, despite clever logic and inexhaustible imagination, Carey fails to recover artistic merit from ?the abyss of relativism.? Perhaps, as Carey suggests, relativism is all we can hope for in world perceived by over 6 billion minds a day. (Jan.) Copyright 2006 Reed Business Information.

Author notes provided by Syndetics

John Carey is Merton Professor of English at Oxford University. A distinguished critic, reviewer, & broadcaster, he is the author of several books, including "The Intellectuals & the Masses".

(Bowker Author Biography)

Powered by Koha