Tchaikovsky's Ballets combines analysis of the music of Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty, and Nutcracker with a description based on rare and not easily accessible documents of the first productions of these works in imperial Russia. Essential background concerning the ballet audience, the collaboration of composer and ballet-master, and Moscow in the 1860s leads into an account of the first production of Swan Lake in 1877. A discussion of the theatre reforms initiated by Ivan Vsevolozhsky, Director of the Imperial Theatres and Tchaikovsky's patron, prepares us for a study of the still-famous 1890 production of Sleeping Beauty, Tchaikovsky's first collaboration with the choreographer Marius Petipa. Professor Wiley then explains how Nutcracker, which followed two years after Sleeping Beauty, was seen by its producers and audiences in a much less favourable light in 1882 than it is now. The final chapter discusses the celebrated revival of Swan Lake in 1985 by Petipa and Leve Ivanov.
Bibliography: p. 414-418 - Includes index.
Reviews provided by Syndetics
CHOICE Review
Exhaustive research and attention to minute detail are reflected in Wiley's amazing recounting of the original productions of Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty, and Nutcracker. Following consideration of the location and the sociocultural profile of its ballet audience, the author describes the initial productions with attention to the collaboration of the composer and ballet master, staging conventions and personalities, dancers and musicians, and the published critical response. Wiley discusses the music of each ballet, treating melody, tonality, thematic unity, and orchestration, as well as placing the composer within the complex structure of ballet production at that time. A wealth of supportive materials includes Tchaikovsky's scenarios, Petipa's scenarios and instructions to the composer, ballet master's plans and choreographic notations, metronome markings from a holograph score, and a thorough listing of source notes. Content, tone, and style make this work appeal primarily to dance and music historians and balletomanes. Theater and social historians will also benefit. Wiley's study should gain recognition rapidly as a definitive resource. Upper-division undergraduate and graduate readership.-R.G. Whaley, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo