Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

Few philosophers of science have influenced as many readers as Thomas S. Kuhn. Yet no comprehensive study of his ideas has existed--until now. In this volume, Paul Hoyningen-Huene examines Kuhn's work over four decades, from the days before The Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the present, and puts Kuhn's philosophical development in a historical framework.

Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political science and art history have offered widely differing interpretations of Kuhn's ideas, appropriating his notions of paradigm shifts and revolutions to fit their own theories, however imperfectly. Hoyningen-Huene does not merely offer another interpretation--he brings Kuhn's work into focus with rigorous philosophical analysis. Through extended discussions with Kuhn and an encyclopedic reading of his work, Hoyningen-Huene looks at the problems and justifications of his claims and determines how his theories might be expanded. Most significantly, he discovers that The Structure of Scientific Revolutions can be understood only with reference to the historiographic foundation of Kuhn's philosophy.

Discussing the concepts of paradigms, paradigm shifts, normal science, and scientific revolutions, Hoyningen-Huene traces their evolution to Kuhn's experience as a historian of contemporary science. From here, Hoyningen-Huene examines Kuhn's well-known thesis that scientists on opposite sides of a revolutionary divide "work in different worlds," explaining Kuhn's notion of a world-change during a scientific revolution. He even considers Kuhn's most controversial claims--his attack on the distinction between the contexts of discovery and justification and his notion of incommensurability--addressing both criticisms and defenses of these ideas.

Destined to become the authoritative philosophical study of Kuhn's work, Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions both enriches our understanding of Kuhn and provides powerful interpretive tools for bridging Continental and Anglo-American philosophical traditions.

Table of contents provided by Syndetics

• Translator's
• Note
• Foreword
• Preface
• Part I Introduction
• Chapter One The Topic of Kuhn's Philosophy of Science
• 1.1 The Issue: Scientific Development
• a The Total Domain of Science
• b Permissible Units of Analysis within the Domain of Science
• 1.2 The Construction of the Target Issue: The Historiography of Science
• a The Old Internal Historiography of Science
• b The Critique of the Old Internal Historiography of Science
• c The New Internal Historiography of Science
• 1.3 The Focus: Structure Summary of Part I
• Part II Scientific Knowledge and Its Object
• Chapter Two The World Concept
• 2.1 The Double Meaning of "World" and "Nature" in SSRand the Plurality-of-Phenomenal-Worlds Thesis
• a World-in-Itself and Phenomenal World in SSR
• b The Plurality-of-Phenomenal-Worlds Thesis and Its Justification
• 2.2 Stimulus and Sensation in the 1969 Papers
• a The Transition from SSR
• b The Ambiguity of the Stimulus Concept
• c Contributions Credited to the Stimulus Ontology
• d Troubles with the Stimulus Ontology
• e The Modified Stimulus Ontology
• 2.3 The Phenomenal World after 1969
• Chapter Three The Constitution of a Phenomenal World
• 3.1 The Learning Process
• 3.2 Similarity Relations
• 3.3 Ostension
• 3.4 Social Community
• 3.5 Perception
• 3.6 Empirical Concepts
• a Preliminary Remarks
• b Concept Learning without Use of Laws or Theories in Kuhn's Work up to 1969
• c Concept Learning without Use of Laws or Theories in Kuhn's Work after 1969
• d The Relationship between Earlier and Later Conceptions of Concept Learning without Use of Laws or Theories
• e Concept Learning with the Help of Laws and Theories
• f The Impossibility of Explicitly Defining Empirical Concepts
• g Consequences for the Theory of Meaning as Applied to Empirical Concepts
• 3.7 Knowledge of Nature
• a The Content of Such Knowledge
• b The Characteristics of Such Knowledge
• 3.8 The Nonneutrality of the Analyst's Viewpoint
• Chapter Four The Paradigm Concept
• 4.1 Reasons for Introducting the Original Paradigm Concept
• 4.2 The Development of the Paradigm Concept
• a From "Paradigm" to "Disciplinary Matrix"
• b The Retraction of the Property of Universal Acceptance
• 4.3 The Disciplinary Matrix
• a Symbolic Generalizations
• b Models
• c Values
• d Exemplary Problem Solutions
• e The Relationship between "Components" of the Disciplinary Matrix
• 4.4 The Functions of Paradigms in the Sense of Exemplary Problem Solutions
• a The Lexicon of Empirical Concepts
• b The Identification of Research Problems
• c The Acceptability of Solutions to Research Problems Summary of Part II
• Part III The Dynamic of Scientific Knowledge
• Chapter Five Normal Science
• 5.1 Normal Science: Provisional Characterization
• 5.2 Analogies to Puzzle-solving
• a The Existence of Regulations
• b Expectations of Solubility
• c No Intention of Fundamental Innovation
• d Neither Test nor Confirmation
• e Individual Motivation
• 5.3 The Research Problems of Normal Science
• 5.4 Progress in Normal Science
• 5.5 What Makes Normal Science Possible?
• a Training Preparatory for Practicing Normal Science
• b The Emergence of Normal Science out of Prenormal Science
• 5.6 The Functional Role of the Quasi-dogmatic Element of Normal Science
• Chapter Six The Concept of a Scientific Revolution
• 6.1 Kuhn's Extension of the Concept of a Scientific Revolution
• 6.2 Change of World
• 6.3 Incommensurability
• a The Introduction of the Incommensurability Concept in SSR
• b Further Developments at the End of the 1960s and in the 1970s
• c Further Development in the 1980s
• d The First Misunderstanding: Incommensurability Implies Incomparability
• e The Second Misunderstanding: Inco

Reviews provided by Syndetics

CHOICE Review

A definitive interpretation of the work of Kuhn, who is undoubtedly this century's most influential writer on the history and philosophy of science. It is warmly recommended in the foreword by Kuhn himself, who remarks that Hoyningen-Huene came to know his work better than, and to understand it nearly as well as, Kuhn himself. The focus is on understanding Kuhn's ideas, not on criticism. This is the book for all those who really want to know what the so often mentioned concepts of scientific revolutions, paradigms, normal science, and incommensurability are all about. As it is a careful philosophical study for scholars, however, it would not serve well as an introduction to Kuhn for those not already acquainted with his work. The translation from German is smooth, though the numerous footnotes make it rather heavy reading. The bibliography gives a complete list of Kuhn's works and an extensive selection from the vast secondary literature. Graduate; faculty; professional.